• The Edge Newsletter
  • Posts
  • "The Obvious Is Obviously Wrong": Why Druckenmiller Would Be Bullish On Maple

"The Obvious Is Obviously Wrong": Why Druckenmiller Would Be Bullish On Maple

Why I Finally Built a Position in $SYRUP

"Too many investors look at the present, the present is already in the price. You have to think out of the box and sort of visualize 18 to 24 months from now...what a company has been earning is ridiculous, it doesn't mean anything. What you have to look at is, what people think its going to earn, and if you can see something in two years that's going to be entirely different than the conventional wisdom...that's how you make money. My first boss used to say, the obvious is obviously wrong. If you invest in conventional wisdom you're going to lose your butt."

- Stanley Druckenmiller

I love this quote.

It captures one of my biggest pet peeves in investing. Too many people try to invest in the present instead of the future. If you want the full clip, it’s here:

Why is this at all relevant to Maple?

I think the conventional wisdom on the current price of $SYRUP doesn't adequately reflect the value of Maple's future potential.

Want me to say it a different way? How about I use meme form:

IMO, the best thing you can possibly do if you hold a strong view that is contra to the market is to act on it.

So, I finally bought some $SYRUP. A small amount for now, but I plan to keep adding to it on dips.

It's taken me a long time, and I've thought I missed the boat many times along the way.

For instance, I initially wrote up $SYRUP in our "Tokens On Our Radar" piece back on April 25th of this year when it was trading at $0.16. It was 1 of 7 liquid tokens I had my eye on that I thought would be worth building a position in.

I watched it run ~4.2x to $0.67 in July. Since then, price has pulled back, even as the underlying fundamentals have continued to improve. Looking ahead to 2026, I see several strong catalysts that have finally started to emerge.

Catalysts Heading Into 2026

✅ Aave Integration

✅ Continued Revenue Growth Potential

✅ Strengthening Tokenholder Alignment and Buyback Clarity

I’m going to break each of these down because they’re important, and all three directly tie into what I think the market is missing.

Aave Integration

Back in July, I learned that Maple was working through governance to get listed on Aave. At the time, Ethena rates were still high and the Aavethena loop was driving huge growth for both parties, especially Ethena. At its peak, Ethena had roughly ~$7B of USDe deposited on Aave.

I wrote more about the significance of a potential Aave and Maple Mainnet deployment below:

Lo and behold, this finally just passed and syrupUSDT (it was syrupUSDC in the initial governance proposal) is now on Aave Mainnet:

When I saw the news, I checked the price right away and noticed only a modest reaction. It was roughly a 12% move. That’s how tough this market is. A few months ago, this could have easily been a 30 % jump.

But the one day price action isn’t the interesting part. I laid out above why this integration matters, and a big piece of it comes from what we saw with Ethena when rates were strong. Over the last few months, Ethena rates have been low and looping hasn’t made much sense at around 4%.

I think Ethena has left a bit of a void in the market, and Maple is in a prime position to capitalize on it. The Mainnet deployment opens the door for syrupUSDT to unlock growth at meaningful scale.

Why is this big for $SYRUP? Here's an excerpt from my X post above that I wrote in July:

This line stands out:

I've heard from reliable sources that $1B of syrupUSDC in circulation adds $15M ARR back to Maple.

- Nomatic

Again, I think it's very reasonable assumption (and possibly modest) that syrupUSDT could get to $2B+ with Aave distribution which would be a relatively large revenue generator for Maple. Potentially adding $30M ARR just with this integration alone.

To sum it up, Aave Mainnet distribution can be a massive TVL catalyst as we've seen in the past with Ethena. I think it could have material impacts on Maple's future cash flow potential.

Continued Revenue Growth Potential

I won't burry the lead, Maple is targeting $100M in ARR for 2026.

After seeing what they've put together in 2025, it's not a stretch to believe its possible. Past performance isn’t a promise on future results, but pretending it has no signal at all is just as flawed.

Maple has a great Dune Dashboard and their revenue growth charts have been continuously referenced around CT for obvious reasons.

Since the beginning of 2024 Maple has been on an incredible growth pace.

Once again they've had an incredible 2025 and they still have lofty goals to close out the year:

If you’re curious how this growth stacks up against the rest of the space, Co-Founders Sid and Joe put together an incredible video series. This ~30-second clip is a great snapshot:

You may be saying to yourself "OK, but all this has already happened and is already reflected in the price".

Yes, this is all past and present information, but I see plenty of reasons for optimism over the mid to long term, including:

  • The Aave integration we already discussed above is just getting started

  • Continued growth in market share in lending side of business

  • Addition of other yield generating strategies: basis trade, stablecoin arbitrage

  • Further growth potential in stablecoin and asset tokenization sectors

If you're looking for a great resource on Maple's 2026 growth plans I highly recommend this report by GLC Research. Here's a segment from their X thread:

And here's a ~40 second clip of Sid and Joe talking through the 2026 strategy:

Lastly, DeFi Dad and I have interviewed close to 200 DeFi founders at this point. Sid and Joe easily rank among the most locked-in founders we’ve ever talked to. If I’m betting on any team to repeat 2025’s success in 2026, it’s this group. Their $100M ARR goal for 2026 is ambitious, but achievable.

Strengthening Tokenholder Alignment and Buyback Clarity

Before buying any token these days, I ask myself a few key questions:

  • Is the token the only representation of ownership for all stakeholders (do all parties have aligned incentives or am I competing with equity interests)?

  • Is the token utilized in anyway within the protocol (is it helpful to hold it - Aerodrome/Pendle etc.)?

  • Does the token have any claim on revenues and is it predictable (buybacks, for example)?

  • Are there significant vesting unlocks that could represent major sell pressure ahead?

This isn't an exhaustive list, but its what came to mind for me in the moment.

Maple finally checks the box to all of the above.

Here's Joe emphasizing the token only point below:

I also liked the way this account summarized Joe's post:

On the buybacks themselves, we finally received clarity on this with the passing of MIP-019: Activate the SSF and Sunset Staking. You can check out DeFi Dad’s summary below:

Putting this all together, we have a token in $SYRUP that now has a plan in place for consistent buybacks, accrues all value to the token and has almost fully emitted its supply (no overhangs).

Conclusion

In my view, the market is still pricing Maple based on what it is today rather than what it’s on track to become. Maple sits at the crossroads of tradfi and defi, and is uniquely positioned to benefit as these two worlds continue to converge.

Aave distribution, expanding revenue lines, and clear buyback mechanics all point to a very different picture 18 to 24 months from now. If Druckenmiller is right that the obvious is obviously wrong, then today’s price of $SYRUP is the opportunity. That’s why I’m positioning now.

This piece reflects my personal opinion only and is not financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset.

Reply

or to participate.